Do you know if Hadronic mechanics is the representing the informational field or the field of consciousness?
TTo read more about it, please visit: http://www.springerlink.com/content/h748p55l56m43p74/
Abstract of latest article of an eager opponent of Hadronic science:
In this paper we introduce, apparently for the first time, the novel ‘hadronic philosophy’,
namely, the philosophy underlying the novel hadronic mechanics and chemistry, invented by
R.M. Santilli and constructed to its present level by himself along with contributions from
numerous other scientists around the world. It is stated that the emergence of hadronic
mechanics, as well as the new hadronic sciences in general, follows the usual pattern of
scientific revolutions, characterized by generalization, broadening and lifting from earlier
theories. The hadronic sciences de facto have far-reaching ontological underpinnings as well
as implications, consistent with the ontological framework established by David Bohm as well
as the differential ontology worked out by the author. The direct universality of hadronic
mechanics is consistent with a universal differential ontology, while Gödel’s theorem(s) is
argued not to hold ontological universality and truth. In differential ontology the universality
of causality is implied in the very concept of information. This follows the intuition of
Einstein, and the information flows corresponding to the new, non-trivial time categories
established by hadronic biology represent scientifically legitimate causality operators. From
the fundamental ontological attributes of the abstract category of “border”, implied in the
very category of information, it is argued that the Fibonacci algorithm is the elementary and
universal form of nature’s information processing. The generation of prime numbers is stated
as glued to the unfolding of the Fibonacci sequence. Also, it is shown by a complementary
weeding out approach that there is a pattern in the prime number sequence, as well as what
pattern this is.
Already the article or its paper lecture has been quoted in published articles by Prof. Robert
Pope (director of Science-Art Research Centre, Australia), Prof. in physics Alexander
Animalu at University of Nigeria (translated to Chinese), Prof. in medicine Erik Trell at
University of Linköping, and – quite profoundly – in the following innovative article in
biophysics authored by mathematical physicist Peter Rowlands at University of Liverpool and
biotechnologist Vanessa Hill at Royal Holloway University of London:
P. Rowlands and V. Hill: Fundamental Mathematical Structures Applied to Physics and
Biology, in Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Alternative Natural Philosophy
Association (ANPA), Cambridge 2005, ed. K. Bowden, 2006.
Peace and love from Lene Lovdahl, The cold Norwegian viking up north ; )
This is a good example of how you can impress people….. repeat in one page the topic 6 times and mix it
with some famous names…. so there cannot be any doubt that the author talks about something significant.
After Proton and Photon-mechanics, Quantum and Quark-mechanics now that they postulate an even
more fundamental particle the Hadron.
Now the best joke….. this time someone comes up with the mechanics of something
that has not even been confirmed to exist ….. Hadron-Mechanics
Few see that this is not something new but a desperate attempt to hold on to the concept of MECHANICS…. what Newton started with
his mechanics of the celestial bodies and his idea of a CLOCKWORK-mechanics does not die out….. now the mix in the word
“Information” …. a bit …. without connection as they can feel something new is coming.
Different to all of these people who put their simple ideas in complicated mathematical language because they know then nobody
can see that their theories does not hold water ….. or put it in pseudo scientific chargo like
” We then show that the classical noncanonical counterparts of the above nonunitary deformations
are equally afflicted by corresponding problems of physical consistency. ”
I show with the simple concept of DLE how to transform your life, how to see the common aspect in most healing modalities,
how to explain why random and coincidence are meaningful, how to perceive why coincidence-recognition is the missing link today,
how to connect to the informational matrix, how to assess the degree of sickness of a person or culture and so on and on…..
Just one more about the text above …. the other word that is repeated even SEVEN times is “ontological” and this is certainly a new pillar of the
new science coming up. Wikipedia as usual does not take any standpoint (which is important to be so popular) and defining :
and God, ontology becomes fundamental to many branches of philosophy.”
For me an Ontological view means to see the world not from a CAUSE & EFFECT point of view but from a EFFECT & PURPOSE/MEANING
point of view and this is truly the shift that will happen and that CoRe is the tool for …. not to find the CAUSE but to find the