In my last post on RANDOMNESS I have outlined that true mathematical randomness is in fact a very rare and difficult to achieve ideal. Here I continue this thought, showing you

how it is related to “Pattern recognition” and how this forms our life – for better or for worse -

When an “untrained” person looks at Blood-dark-field pictures, attempts a kinesological test, tries a pulse or EDS diagnosis he will most of the time, if honest to himself, feel that what he is perceiving/ doing/ assessing is random.

For that reason all of these diagnostic measures have never braved “double blind” studies that would have proven any objective value, which means reproducible results, independent of the practitioner.

Trained users however swear to their objective nature and blame failure of “double blind” studies on lack of training or even outright  fraud by the scientific establishment.

As a physicist that has seen great value of these methods I was in a DLE between this experience and my university training. However instead of embracing one without further questioning and rejecting the other I went to work and did more studies which eventually lead to the development of the CoRe system.

I found that all these evaluation techniques have in common that they offer an almost infinite number of choices and possibilities to be taken as the evaluation result. Anyone who has ever attempted dark-field-blood analysis knows that one sample of blood under the microscope contains specimens of about every possible diagnostic indicator. Likewise with Electrodermal screening, the measurement is dependent of so many factors, mostly speed of application of the probe, skin humidity and texture, angle of the probe a.s.o. that “untrained” testers will produce about  every possible reading, exactly like a pendulum.

For that reason the majority of the “scientific” community considers all of them subjective or even fraudulent.

The reason why there was never any possible bridge between these two opposite points of view, as I understand now, is simply that both are equally believers in the same incomplete concept of “scientific-ness”.

Both camps believe for something to be scientific or even accessible to our minds inquiry at all, there have to exist :

A)   Clear, distinct, unquestionable pattern

B)    Pattern are reproducible by any trained practitioner

C)    That these pattern have a definite meaning

Both parties believe that scientific-ness is impossible in the absence of even one of these 3 criteria.

Looking closer at all of them we can realize that the terms in bold are descriptors of the modus operandi of the left brain : clear, distinct, unquestionable, reproducible, definite.

Herman Grösser who had been doing many years of conventional manual radionics until that time, created his own computerized radionic system BIORESONANCE-3000 only month after he had attended my workshop at a German radionic conference.

At this workshop I had explained that the CoRe system was able to have reproducible results because of PATTERN REOGNITION. He had the idea to achieve the same reproducibility in the bioresonance-3000 that he set up quickly, by matching the input of the user against many sacred texts. The way how he did understand my mentioning of pattern-recognition was as a kind of complex numerology that evaluated the meaning of text by assigning a number to a string. He had the “innovative” idea to match the strings the user enters to what he considered sacred texts. But unsure of its value he still offers the usual random number generator as well, as a reference source.

I am giving this example because it is a recent example of how we generally misunderstand PATTERN RECOGNITION as the way out of the challenge that RANDOMNESS poses to our left brain.

We want that it is true that “if you freeze a bottle of water that had BEAUTIFUL written on it” all the crystals are then also showing this beauty whereas if you write “Hitler” on it they demonstrate its satanic, dark and ugly qualities. And if we find someone like Emoto who proves this to us in hundreds of pictures we rest assured that our wish is actual reality.

More on this next week in Part 3

Bookmark to: