

Dear Kiran,
My intention when I sent the images was to share an impression I had. I thought that it could have been a source of meditation and free interpretation for others. I “saw” the dual image spiderweb – metal grid while reading your answer to Marshall’s questions.
My understanding of the analogy was that CoRe has the sensitivity of a spider web, that it catches the most subtle and refined vibrations related to the informational field of the person you work with. Since CoRe is a tool that facilitates spiritual healing, we could imagine that it is sensitive to vibrations in that realm. It cannot be defined as a fixed and stable metal grid that could be made to vibrate and react only by a hammer or some strong ‘material’ intervention.
From another perspective, the analogy could be applied also to the practitioner, whose mind-spirit can become flexible, sensitive and in a ‘dynamic labile equilibrium’, somewhat like a spider web, or it can be rigid, rusted and impossible to be touched by anything else than “hard” facts.
I also thought that with time the CoRe-device gets into a sort of ‘entanglement’ with the practitioner, so it’s not ‘how does CoRe’ work generically, but “how does my CoRe work”. Nuno said some time ago that CoRe can be a prolongation of one’s Self.
Another thought I had while meditating on the two images was that it’s interesting to note also the changes that appear in the practitioner in conjunction with working with CoRe. For myself I know that I started to understanding things more in images than in words, even in usual life circumstances. As if there is a new ‘component’ in my thinking machine that produces images in association with thoughts, in a way that it did not before.
The problem is that the ‘translator’ or ‘interpreter’ of that type of image feeling-understanding is not skilled enough yet to be able to explain into coherent ‘normal’ words. That’s why I sent only the images and avoided to put words that could maybe spoil the potentiality of different interpretations for those who looked at it.
I am in a way glad that you asked me to say more, because I like to share. However, I’m not convinced that I managed to render at least a small part of the beauty I felt when I had that image-understanding.
In friendship,
Daniela
Kiran’s reply :
Dear Daniela
this is perfect…. we are all beginners in describing what we know and experience
in relationship to the perception and processing of information
we have to share and not just leave it to the subjective way to perceive and process
because there are objective laws to discover
…. and that is the science of information
Kiran