CNN provides us with the material to be always NOW

Recently at my seminars in Hungary and Romania I became aware how much the current economic crisis was part of most blaming and explaining.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark to:

My desktop with some reminders for the right DLE attitude

How did (and does) DLE change our life?

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark to:

- Sonia recently forwarded a slightly negative comment about Kiran "He acts as if he were Tarzan" - yes sometimes

NOTE : no Educational value whatsoever, just showing you a way how you can get a full RESET within one day

Visual tour I made with my good friends and distributors in Hungary Agnes and Pal, honoring how they inspired me to adventure in the undiscovered side of my island – and coincidentally I write this post from their home in Budapest where we will have our seminar this weekend

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark to:

I am using 12 Kg of weights to keep me down.... if we would not have weights in our life we would fly like birds....but to be human is a special fortune .... because of DLE

Dear All

One of my most favorite movies is called “Wings of desire” which actually a very unfitting translation of the German original title “Himmel ueber Berlin” (Sky over Berlin) which narrates an  archetypal  conflict/ polarity/ DLE. That between wanting to be an angel and that of angels wanting to be human. We might have heard about the former but the later is probably as common, but less known.

There are different forms of angels but the angles that this movie talks about is a form of creation that do not know the feeling of suffering and love  and all other DLE feelings that come with being human….. so the story is about an angel giving up this lofty existence that knows no hardship and also as a result not the feeling of  release and lightness and voluntarily becomes human .

This film teaches that it was easy for the creator to establish a life-form that does not know suffering but it shows that this limits the possibilities of growth and evolution — hard to understand for those who think paradise is a place where there is no suffering anymore, no need for food and harmony is a sur-plus item.

This new/old teaching of DLE is about knowing that the different polarities of experience are essential for our health and our potential for change — NON-ATTACHMENT / refusing/ disregarding/ not-wanting-to-see of any one pull/ desire/ tendency is not a way out but a way into sickness and by acceptance we can be in a constant oscillation between the polarities.

From this point of view it is not balance that is desirable (what is more balanced then sleep and death ?) but a more and more frequent oscillation between the contradictory pulls with ever lessening amplitude.

We like to get involved in  activities that  represent the move between polarities excess activity – fatique,  racing – total stand-still at the breach over-eating – dieting, arguing – subordination, love – hate, roller coaster up – down and a million more of which some never nourish our need for DLE but only create hunger for more.

My second most favorite DLE (wonder what is my favorite one ?)is that between SINKING – FLOATING its called Buoyancy and I can tell you that when you come out of it, you are reset and again connected to the world around you, amazed and inspired at the wonders that wait for you — so much so that I even forgot I could talk

by the way this beach is close to where you will stay at the AIM training and I have a Tank with AIR waiting for you.

Bookmark to:

Summary : the homeopathic and allopathic law of attraction and cure / Affirmations like  “I want this …” or “I don’t want that …..” mostly have an opposite result / our Americanized wish-full thinking culture /

Purpose : How to make the polarity law information useful to create affirmations and wishes / Uncertainty is the very foundation of life and how  attitude and understanding of it can change your life and be the best protection / Developing awareness of informational obstacles to the experience of ONENESS

“Dreams and Wishes never come true”

This is what the author of “Transurfing reality” writes, which is so opposite to what our Americanized culture wants us to believe.

Remember the American dream “If you want to upgrade from dish-washer to Hotel owner you can – DO IT YOURSELF” and the new bestseller “THE SECRET” sell the same dogma in a new packaging “The universe is following the LAW OF ATTRACTION  what you really want/ wish/ dream/ visualize can only come true – YOU CAN DO IT” and if it does not happen, deep down you do not want it….. you think you do not deserve it, …. You are self-sabotaging.

There a two basic laws 1. THE HOMEOPATHIC “like attracts/ cures like “ and 2. THE ALHOPHATIC “opposites attract/ cure each other”.

FEAR is very often the basis of attracting exactly what you fear, does not matter what you  do to avoid it or as the SUFI saying goes :

“YOU MEET YOUR FATE ON THE PATH YOU CHOOSE TO AVOID IT”

We had a good example here last month, Debora has a fear of houses on the hill, and if you would know the power of most rainfalls here in Brazil you could understand why. Therefore when we were looking for a new home we quickly skipped all the houses that did not seem to have super-solid foundations and finally decided with one that although being on a slope, had apparently very strong walls around it and we spend 6 month a lot of money to re-enforce these walls. When this project was almost finished one tremendous rain made the new wall collapse and mud gushing down the hill almost taking the  house with it.

after a month of repair the new wall is half-way up already..... fear made even the "walls of Jericho" fall ... learn how to go beyond wishful thinking and fearful praying

On the other hand, we know many cases where people have positive convictions and know for example that “money will always come” and it comes ….there is no question that “they get the parking space right where they want it” and they always get it.

The first is an example of Informational Information which as I said follows the law of Polarity and the second is Spiritual Information which follows ONENESS.

First step to understand this is to realize how much we are infected with the American virus ME, ME, ME ….. “IF ANYONE CAN DO IT, IT IS ME” or a few affirmations that represent this informational concept:

1. For you cannot live in someone else. You cannot find yourself in someone else. You cannot be given a life by someone else. Of all the people you will know in a lifetime, you are the only one you will never leave nor lose.
2. It is a delight to discover people who are worthy of respect, admiration, and love, but it is vital to believe yourself posses these qualities.
3. To the question of your life, you are the only answer. To the problems of your life, you are the only solution.

THIS IS WHAT I CALL THE AMERICAN SUPER-EGO trip…. And certainly what they are reaping now is a result of this. In the beginning however this was a healthy reaction/ escape/ transformation/ DLE to the stagnant concept of 16^th and 17^th and 18^th century Europe that your fate is decreed by god and society on you, was what you had to live.

Now as with every religion/ dogma/ idea we have come to the other extreme and “THE SECRET” is a wonderful example …. No exceptions, no doubts, no questions ….. a WE KNOW IT ALL and WE HAVE THE ANSWER FOR YOU attitude….. in short no DLE allowed. Answers however that are closer to the truth always leave room for uncertainty, questions, doubt, exceptions, different categories and scenarios.

Then there is the other big group of people who pray and go to church for one single reason : “To make their life more secure and get the things they want” so the pray “GIVE ME THIS and GIVE ME THAT and PROTECT ME AND ALL I LOVE FROM EVERYTHING BAD” they try to get at church the x% extra security that their family/ bank account/ insurance company cannot provide them.

NOW God built in all these disasters, losses, diseases, misfortunes not because he made a mistake, not because he could not make a world that could provide complete certainty and security or because he wants to punish those who  do not believe in him or make up for the “original sin of Eva”.

Uncertainty is the very foundation of this world, no matter how much we like it or how much we try to escape it. If we finally learn not only to accept uncertainty but to cherish  and to live it, DLE turns from a threat to a life-giving principle.

Uncertainty makes us explorers, it makes us open and creative to live new possibilities as they open up, it makes us humble and most of all it makes us hungry for the only true certainty that there is… as Hafiz said

“One thing is certain and all the rest is lies”

And this certainty is the experience of ONENESS.

We do not realize how much this aim for ONENESS is being compromised with affirmations like these :

1. I accept complete responsibility for everything I think, say, feel, and do.
2. I am able to manage myself. I do not require instruction every step of the way.
3. I know myself well and still expect to find hidden talents, resources, strengths, weaknesses, energy, and interests.

The move from Self-centered-ness to ONENESS does not come when your EN-lightened this is a DLE that it built into the four-foldedness, the Quadtrinity of existence. However we have to see when we or one of our clients has become stuck on one or the other side of this polarity either by complete dependence/ addiction/ believe in his “DO IT YOURSELF” ability/ responsibility or in the self-forgetting/ mother-theresa spirit of the ONENESS seeker.

How to formulate an affirmation is an art-form that we are only re-learning and for which the CoRe system is an invaluable tool.

What I wanted to show with this post is that “I want this …” or “I don’t want that …..” type of affirmations are mostly having an opposite result.

Now lets end with a conclusion that for most of you will be hard to digest although it was certainly a common attitude before the advent of the USA culture. If we accept that most people wish for things their whole life and in most (not all) the opposite comes true or persists we can possibly agree to what Vadim said “Wishes and Dreams never come true” but they constantly try to create and excess potential (with wishing and desiring) and all natural laws are geared, made to neutralize/ level/ equalize unevenness.

How can you make an affirmation that is the opposite of what you hope for in  order that the law of polarity can get you what you wish:

Certainly not by affirming “I want my house slide down the hill” but how about this :

“If god wants it is fine with me if the house is washed down”

1.And this way we do not pray for a certainty and protection that is an illusion and that is not the plan of creation but  instead we become humble recipient and understand that there is a authority ONENESS that I eventually have to obey or as Rilke said

“Wenn wir am Ende der grimmigen Einsicht Jubel und Rum aufsingen zustimmenden Engeln”

2.Also we accept uncertainty with this kind of attitude and even actively take risks as for example that you take the step NOW to make a reservation for the AIM training no matter how many factors you are still uncertain about…. because remember… “if you wait or pray for CERTAINTY you will be waiting all your life…. and it will pass unused”

3.And we do not suppress all the possibilities that our life may still turn into

4.And we formulate our biggest fears that informational laws will help to make the opposite come true is not opposed to the PLAN

Or in simple words, as the most universal generic affirmation, that we all have to re-learn

“THY WILL BE DONE”

Bookmark to:

Summary : Different forms of Entropy / DLE-Entropy

Purpose : Certain types of Entropy have great potential for change others don’t / Ways to distinguish one from the other / Understanding DLE-Entropy as a result of energetic processes

K: Dear Lucian  believe me I dont want to stay on the philosophical talk level … but I
know and you know that math is just a language to formulate ideas… so the ideas have to come
first.

L: I agree – these ideas form what I call the physics interface (or some other science’s); then a good math-programmer can “spell” it into math-code: definitions and formulas.
K: Of course there is the kind of Entropy where moving mass is equally
distributed in space

L: Mass is a classic concept which entails knowing the position, e.g. matter density etc. If we don’t have a “Newtonian” distribution of mass, or we don’t know where it is, we then have a probability distribution of the “total mass”; this p-distrib. has an entropy; I would call it “static” …

K: this I would call Kinetic Entropy or Thermodynamic Entropy  but how is the Entropy of an Electro-magnetic Field defined just to say that the Energy density in space is even does not tell anything
about the Frequency distribution for example a room with white light evenly filled would be the same Entropy with one for example where half is filled with blue light and the other with red
light but the red light district has just a higher intensity (like in Amsterdam )

L: If we accept Einstein’s “trade”: energy<->matter, then what I said earlier applies to light too.
But so far  did not mention quantum states; pure states in superposition, e.g. entanglement, have zero von Neumann entropy, while measurements will yield values with various probabilities, therefore having an entropy … a bit misleading, which shows that the term entropy depends heavily on context.

K: Is there a Frequency-Entropy defined that would mean that all Frequencies
are equally distributed ?

L: There are models which tell what’s the probability for each of the possible frequency of a resonant cavity; for example: Planck’s black-body radiation formula (an old issue – starting the quantum revolution).

K: or is there only the Energy-even-distribution-entropy definition ?

L: The fundamental concept which determines the behavior of a system is its Partition Function Z=Sum exp(-En/kT), which essentially tells what the possible energy levels are, and what are the probabilities for the system to be in one of these energies: Pn=exp(-En/kT)/Z (normalization).
Then the Shannon entropy of the this probability distribution is H=- Sum Pn log Pn.

Unfortunately such “fundamentals” are not always useful in practical situations one comes across with … Our last discussion was centered around EM-potentials with zero EM-field strengths: if they don’t carry energy-momentum, then what are they? I said “information” in a wider sense of “structure”, which in algebra usually means “the groups of symmetries of that system”; the bigger the group, the less we know in which state the system is at a given time, so the entropy of the system is, following a Bolzmann-like formula, H=log Symm(System).
To make sense of this in the above example, we would have to use a discrete model for space (time is just a parameter), and it’s not the place …

Bottom line, what I think it is relevant for Inergetix, is that such an EM-potential can be modulated so that it can carry classical information without transporting energy; why it’s a remarkable new possibility? because it is not screened by obstacles, and it cannot be detected by conventional measurement devices (multi-meters, EEG, ECG etc.), since these conventional EM-measuring devices measure EM-field strengths, not EM-global potentials.

I should emphasize that scalar/vector potentials are of two types: zero-field strengths potentials: locally they produce E=0, B=0, so let’s call them global potentials; and the usual local potentials, generating E & B.
The global potentials cannot be gauged away, so they do have a physical meaning, when the region of interest is not simply connected, like around a thin coil (Aharonov-Bohm).

Well, too much details; the main idea: global potentials have “structure”, but not energy/matter, so it’s “pure information” in a wider sense, not as “negentronpy”, i.e. not minus entropy as a measure of lack of our knowledge of the system.

I’m not sure if I explained in a coherent way, but I’ll try to explain these things until I understand them myself )….. Lucian

K: its rare to find scientists with such an honest attitude to their own work….. luckily you  understand that the illusion of “COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE IS DEATH”  a desperate attempt to exterminate islands of DLE-Entropy in ones own informational world. A dynamic interface between Knowledge (stability/ equilibrium) and Lability (not knowing/ doubt/ question) is the basis/ potential for growth/ change.

To my understanding exists a form of Entropy that is not just the “useless end-result of energetic processes” but on the contrary is the primordial soup of apparently chaotic particles/ mass-distribution/ information/ thought/ mind-activity/ events that is basis for a new cycle to begin.

There are many analogies or examples for this process, for example after big disasters like war/ fires/ earthquakes most people start again from almost nothing (this is a state of Entropy) that however gives new opportunities to some who will take it and then again to make great fortunes and once the initial wealth is created the accumulation of money in the hands of a few goes mechanically until the most gigantic multinational business monsters are formed. Money is potential energy that means it has the potential to set things in motion, just as gravitational mass, heat, electrical or magnetic potential energy.

Now all of you know what happened in the past when great and wealth cultures got broken down into a state of virtual Entropy… the cycle started again…. This is only one common-sense example that certain types of Entropy, I call it DLE_Entropy is not the end but the beginning just as the early Masonic’s new

“Ordo ab chao” Order out of chaos. Chaos is not the end but a door and the “beginning of the end” …. For those who know how to use it

Energy-Information E= k*I equivalent according to Kiran Schmidt

The study and science of Entropy will be the basis of the Science of Information, because as Kiran postulates the world will understand that DLE/ Chaos/ Entropy is not the end of Energy processes buyt the beginning of a new cycle it is INFORMATION it is IN-“FORMATION”

S much for now…. You will hear about this as much as about DLE as both are only 2 different words for the same thing…… and I want to end with a quote from Claude Shannon the originator of the concept of “information Entropy” when he met in 1949 the great mathematician John von Neumann :

My greatest concern was what to call it. I thought of calling it ‘information’, but the word was overly used, so I decided to call it ‘uncertainty’. When I discussed it with John von Neumann, he had a better idea. Von Neumann told me, ‘You should call it entropy, for two reasons. In the first place your uncertainty function has been used in statistical mechanics under that name, so it already has a name. In the second place, and more important, nobody knows what entropy really is, so in a debate you will always have the advantage.

What both did not realize was that:

CERTAINTY = Potential Energy and UNCERTAIN ENERGY/ Entropy = INFORMATION

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_entropy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy#Entropy_in_quantum_mechanics_.28von_Neumann_entropy.29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(information_theory)

Bookmark to:

DLE – and Openness to Change (without Yes-But)

Kiran’s recent suggestion to communicate more through this Forum, stimulated me to share something about… a personal celebration.

This month, it’s exactly one year since I met Kiran’s CoRe-Theory and  started working with the CoRe-System. Some of you might wonder why could this be a reason for ‚celebration’. Isn’t ‚celebration’ too big a word?

I celebrate the new Connection to Change that working with CoRe brought into my life.

One year ago, I only ‚felt’ that CoRe – the theory, the new world view, the device, the community of users and practitioners – was something great and most probably valid. At the same time, my mind did not understand much and ‚believed’ even less. The first evaluations I made were more about my fear of the unknown and about being uncomfortable with the uncertainty about the CoRe results.  The obsessive questions about why, how much, how often, is it good or bad, is it the cause or the remedy, were constantly floating through my mind and blurred insight, intuition and… results. Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark to:

DLE – and Homeopathy

I am pleased that Rudi Vespoor the dean of the Hahnemann College of Heilkunst www.homeopathy.com , which  is using the CoRe system as an integral part of their teaching. Together with Steven Decker have supplied me with some material I can use to be posted on the Forum.

.... with Rudi and Patty at their home in Ottawa 2007

The Hahnemann College for Heilkunst ist teaching Hahnemann’s ideas not a often the case reduced to his ideas about the homeopathic principle but about his complete system of curing and healing that he called “Heilkunst”.

Steven Decker has studied the works of Hahnemann as few others and has provided the most accurate translation to date of the extended Organon of Heilkunst, the magnum opus of Hahnemann’s system of medicine. This translation is available at amazon.com and is a three-part, interlinked e-text in the original German (integral text), the interlinear, and finally the English rendition.

I also studied Hahnemann’s works in detail and practice for almost 5 years as a Homeopath in India in a very busy clinic. The comments that I will make in the following do not necessarily reflect that of Steven Decker or Rudi Vespoor nor of Samuel Hahnemann. I feel the I am standing on the shoulders of giants and I know the ideas expressed bring Hahnemann’s ideas to new levels of practicality and universality.

The quotes on quotation marks are taken from the complete text “Heilkunst” available here : http://enc.slider.com/Enc/Heilkunst.

“Hahnemann made a fundamental distinction between disease, a dynamic impingement of the generative side of the Living Principle or Dynamis, and imbalance, a disturbance of the sustentive power.”

The concept of DLE that I consider the basis not only of health but also the concept to describe anything in nature contains the idea that there are always two polar forces necessary. One of them is the “labilizing” and the other the “equalizing”. Only for the latter the concept of “balancing” makes any sense and this is the field that is almost exclusively considered the purpose of medicine both in alopathy as well as in most holistic medicine fields today.

Most consider it enough to create balance in the various aspects of health be it stress/ relaxation, acid / alkaline, activity/ rest, high blood pressure/ low blood pressure and consider imbalance as the only cause for disease. Hahnemann knew that there were actually two aspects to consider the “sustentive/ preserving principle” which calls for and sustains balance and the mostly forgotten or misinterpreted “living principle” that he called Dynamis and that I call the “labilizing principle”.

Steven translated also very sensibly “impingement of the living principle” and not for example as “imbalance”. Imbalance it the basis and essence of the living principle and any attempt to balance it, really kills it. The life-principle can only be limited in its degrees of freedom or “impinged” and that is the more often the cause for disease than an imbalance of the “preserving principle”. All our culture, education, ways of living, insurance companies are taking care of the “preserving principle” to a degree that it impinges/ imprisons the live-principle the “openness to change”, the basis of DLE.

DLE is the dynamic interplay between balancing and labilizing / creative forces. If we exclusively focus on balancing/ stabilizing a client we do not reason or act different than allopathic medicine but we indirectly promote death, which is the most perfect form of stability.

“Hahnemann also provided a clear distinction between the initial action (Erstwirkung) of the disease agent, which involves an almost imperceptible impingement of the generative power (Erzeugungskraft) of the Living Principle, and the counteraction (Gegenwirkung, Nachwirkung) of the sustentive side (Erhaltungskraft), which produces the various symptoms we associate with disease, but which is really the effort of the Living Principle or Dynamis to rid the human organism of disease.”

Hahneman’s Organon is the most concise description of what I call now the science of Informational Medicine and he is not confusing it with all kind of  terms from the field of energy physics as most  of  those who try to mix some information terminology into their philosophy.  Simply because at the time he wrote it the concept of Energy had not even been discovered and consequently “bad Frequencies” could not be blamed for all that one did not understand.

For him it was clear that all stage of what we call disease are  actually a curative attempt of the organism. In my experience the first stage is usually a reaction of the preserving power to achieve balance by inversion that means if your temperature goes down to increase it or if you blood sugar goes down to increase it, this is what I call the allopathic principle and is the first reaction that the organism has to most common prescription drugs.

Hahnemann however  observed further that if the dose is reduced increasingly the second stage of drug action is becoming more prevalent which is the effect of the live-principle that is different than the preserving principle an attempt to go with the flow rather than to oppose it. The labilizing/ creative/ life-principle in other words is the basis for the “like cures like” principle. Here again you can see that this expression of the life-principle is completely suppressed and forgotten in our culture because many wrongly associate “insecurity” with it.

In my teaching of DLE I focus on showing how a limitation of the life-principle is frequently the cause of illness simply because in our culture and possibly at all times there is more than enough focus on rectifying any possible imbalance of the preserving principle.

“While vitalism was a strong movement within Western science during the 19th century, as a counterweight to the overly materialistic trends of the time, Hahnemann was part of a third and lesser-known stream of thought called the dynamic system, which includes Goethe, Coleridge, the Hunterian physicians, and later Rudolf Steiner and Wilhelm Reich to name the most important contributors.”

Most people today understand or at least feel that besides the stabilizing forces exists a live-giving other force that has a dynamic/ creative tendency.

The mistake that was made when the different forms of energy were discovered as electricity, magnetism, light was to assume that energy was the cause  of this vitalizing life-giving principle.

Particularly Goethe and Steiner knew that it was primarily information/ Bildung/ Morphology that was the most powerful agent for change/ creativity/ life and consequently also its most powerful inhibitor. Biodynamic gardening based on Steiner’s work is using essentially information to achieve its results.

CoRe extends this tradition in focusing on developing the powers of information for healing while at the same time providing the largest array of applicators for energy, while promoting the concept that it is not energy that heals but the information that it carries. Information different than energy does not necessarily contain momentum, it is its energy content that generates it.

.... right and left brain in DLE to reach the essence

Bookmark to:

Polarity does exist, we all know, but what can we do with it? Is it a valuable tool, or just another of these traditional issues of orthodox science? Is polarity only restricted to the energy environment in which we live? Certainly not!

When we meet with someone, we constitute the 2 main poles. If we work radionically with a target object, there are two main poles, the target object and yourself. Of course other poles are formed between the target and its environment aso…let’s call it a multi-polar situation in flux. But what keeps the poles in such dynamic situations related in just the way they are? The answer is: Resonance.

Of course this needs some explanation. If you are holding a classic guitar in your hands, and someone is playing a piano in the same room, your guitar body will soon start to vibrate. This of course makes us think that resonance has only to do with energy vibrations, but this is absolutely not the case.Edgar Mitchell (yes, the famous astronaut and pilot of Apollo 14) quotes: “Resonance is nature’s way of transferring information.”, and this is exactly the key issue of working efficiently with the CoRe.

Transferring information is the most important procedure to deal with, because it makes the resonant fields in a multi-polar situation (as is constantly the case with radionics) much more accessible to the CoRe practitioner. It is the personal resonance that allows us to be ‘informed’ by the other. It is the practitioner’s resonance with the target object and vice versa, that forms, and is in turn formed by the quality of the resonant information field that emerges between both.

Resonance, in the classical sense that believes in separate entities, already is not a one-way affair. As soon as one begins to resonate, the information fields open up, and the most relevant information in the particular situation becomes available. So it just takes a small switch in our understanding to see the information fields as foundational. What happens between the CoRe user and his target object(s) has a much more meaningful influence than the traditional theory of the polarity. You can also put it in another way: You cannot reduce the information fields to the sum of its participating beings and entities. The result is a wide portfolio of information due to the resonant factor.

Willy De Maeyer

Kiran’s comment :

Thank you Willy for bringing up this topic, it has become one of the most important ideas over the time working with CoRe and I put it into the

symbol of AIM the hermes or caduceus symbol with the 2 snakes embracing each other it is actually a much older symbol for medicine then the Asclepius

symbol which contains only one snake or pole but is very appropriately representing the one-sidedness of  modern medicine.

My current approach that I teach in my seminars is to find the key polarity in a persons life which is usually represented in the top 2 items on each

evaluation and use them exclusively for information and communication and have very good results with it…. much better than the very old

rule of thumb to use all results over 35% .

Polarity is the basis of DLE and the moment we are not open for polarity anymore in whatever area is when disease has to come in to re-establish the flow

that is only possible with polarity.

It is not important how YIN or how Yang you are with respect to anything nor is is desirable to establish balance between the two…. imagine a humanity of androgen beings half male and half female, what a nightmare but we are healthy and alive when we can move easily from one pole to the other, day and night, active and resting, vegetarian and carnivorous, supporting and leading, linear and networking……

Bookmark to:

I asked Dr de Maeyer to make this post about this gypsy technique he had shown at the Munich seminar http://www.informationenergymedicine-academy.com/the-gypsy-method/ because for one it shows how much we are aligned in our view of informational techniques and secondly it gives you another example of how the creation of DLE was used at all times to make connection to the Informational Matrix.

I know DLE is and will be the formula for the informational age just as E=mc2 was the one of the energetic age. However different than energy and matter in the realm of information it is not about matter, but about QUALITY and RELATIONSHIP as quantities and numbers do not exist here.

Quality on a closer view is always a relationship as there is no ABSOLUTE QUALITY and we all know that we are lying for example when we are saying “This is the best” or “This is the worst” because all is only relative to what else we have experienced before.

Quality therefore is mathematically a PROPORTION and this is what Goethe talked about when he said that “Number is nothing, Relationship is everything” . Whereas today in science this has been inverted where most believe that “Only what can be given a number and that can be measured in this quantitative way is real”

What has all this to do with the Dr de Maeyers Gypsy technique and with the DLE ? Simply the most fundamental Relationship is that between two things and that is the basis of DLE, two somewhat different things will create different degrees of a polarity.

The fundamental building blocks of the informational realm are not qualities like day and night, male and female, hot and cold but all possible permutations of relationships/ proportions between any two of them. This is the mathematical formulation of what I want now to explain in more simple words.

With the concept of DLE in mind we will understand that we are missing the main point if we say it is hot or I am male or it is dark and particularly if we add I am too…. (Tired, sick, late, average, unsuccessful), because we are turning a blind eye on the other component in the experience.

“In fact every experience is a DLE experience because without polarity there would not be any energy flow, sensual perception or informational discrimination. We are getting sick by losing the necessary polar component and we get healthy by re-introducing it.”

This is not only limited to health and sickness but also to spiritual transformation and to the possibility to increase our sensual awareness as in Willy’s experiment. Here is my question that I would like you to comment on :

1. Do you think it is necessary to see pictures like this cross-eyed to get an effect and if yes or no, please explain

2. Why do you think it was just the Gypsies that invented this technique and why it is the Gypsies that are so renowned in psychic abilities ?

Bookmark to:

Dear Kiran,

This is a meditation technique, a tool for training mind and perception which has been passed on from generation to generation in secret by French gypsies, and which we teach to all our students.

Looking at the coloured shapes (left) with crossed eyes puts the mind in an extremely alert state, balances hemispheric dominances and leads to highly unusual states of perception. While the gaze is resting motionless on the “Tables”, the mind can roam freely and gain introspective insights that our everyday consciousness can hardly ever access.

With this technique you can refine his sensory perception, consciously establish your hemispheric balance, and often enough clearly (and calmly) observe emerging content of the subconscious. A dramatic and lasting improvement of the eyesight is usual.

The Gypsy tool

During the meditation the coloured shapes shown on the left (two rows of Tables arranged vertically) serve as an anchor for the eyes and the mind. The eyes look at the Tables in an unusual way: the right eye looks at the left row of Tables, the left one at the right row. In order to do this the eyes must be crossed slightly (a finger held up at half distance can serve as a “crutch”).

By looking at them with crossed eyes a third (virtual) row of Tables becomes visible between the original two. It is on this central row of Tables that the eyes are brought to rest during meditation. This central row will have a fuchsia color!

We have been experimenting a lot with those tables, and many of our students practice it every day. It increases the ability of working with radionics in an impressive way.

Best regards

Willy

FOLLOW-up:

Dear Kiran,

please find hereafter a copy of a mail from Angelika (she is also always logged-in during your seminars).

Apart from the fact that she enrols for our January  seminar in Starnberg, she writes that she is using the tables of Chartres, every day, and that since she started the exercise, she had a dramatic improvement of her eyesight…She can read her computer screen without using her glasses any more….

Just wanted to let you know.

Best regards

Willy

Bom dia Gabriele et Willy,

J’espère que vous allez bien, en tout cas je vois que vous mettez toutes les chances de votre côté. Je ferai mon possible pour participer à votre stage en janvier à Starnberg. Pourvu qu’il ne neige pas à l’aéroport de Nice.

Presque tous les jours, je fais le gypsy exercice. En vous écrivant je me rends compte que je lis à l’écran sans lunettes, ce qui n’était plus le cas, me semble-t-il. Par contre, mon regard incommode toujours certaines personnes. Pénible.

Les contributions de Willy au forum sont un plaisir pour moi. Pour l’instant je ne me sens pas encore capable de participer. Cela viendra.

J’aimerais acheter votre nouveau livre dès qu’il sortira.

Actuellement je cherche un endroit pour passer un DLE Noël avec mon mari. J’ai pensé à la Laponie et aux marchés de Noël en Alsace. What else?

A bientôt et beaucoup de bonheur.

Angelika

Bookmark to: