Jiro : Dear Kiran many practitioners are especially interested in allergy testing . Although there are several allergy screens in The CoRe and many are custom made but they carry the draw back that the system is evaluating these allergies relative to each others although each one of them should be considered as independent variable . I can be severely allergic to 20 or even 30 substances far beyond the 10 substances picked by the resonance screening.
K: I limited the number of resonances shown to 10 as most people have the US american informational virus “more is better” and therefore almost all USA isa bout “accumulating” not only things as the 100 thousand self-storage places in the USA show (and wich have no likeness in other countries) but also of symptoms – you are not allergic to one thing but to really have a reason to be sick you have to have to really will be considered sick by the people around you http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1696414/pdf/bmj00040-0005.pdf
The overlap between psychiatric disorder and environmental illnesses is unsurprising. Almost by definition,patients who claim multiple allergies suffer from multiplesomatic symptoms that conventional medicine cannot explain. One of the strongest findings in psychiatric epidemiology is that the risk of psychiatric disorder increaseslinearly with the number of symptoms with which patients present.’
The overlap between psychiatric disorder and environmental illnesses is unsurprising. Almost by definition,patients who claim multiple allergies suffer from multiplesomatic symptoms that conventional medicine cannotexplain. One of the strongest findings in psychiatric epidemiology is that the risk of psychiatric disorder increaseslinearly with the number of symptoms with which patients present.’
So this is already part of allopathic understanding but most holistic practitioners have not lived up to the understanding of the “informational cause” of allergy and they want to really make a total/ complete/ satisfying/ scientific list of a persons allergies – and best even with a number. This informational virus that has apparently also spread to Lebanon I do not want to amplify – that is why I limit the number of resonances shown.
Also I know that if you try to tackle more than 2 issues at the same time your overall success will be reduced proportionately by the number of issues you want to solve at the same time (multitasking – another good idea that USA psychology has taken completely out of proportion – and is another undiagnosed informational illness that is at the root of so many physical diseases and mainly allergy)
I see most people do not even take the time to read an e-mail to the end, let alone these long articles by Kiran because they have to “multi-task” and this limited attention-span is of course not only limited to the mind and emotions but also to the body – and so you can understand that many allergies are the result of the limited attention that the immune system is able to generate and therefore it mis-reads so many simple things like wheat and sugar as an enemy that has to be reacted to.
Jiro : It would be best if for each food the system will choose coincidentally the most appropriate degree of allergy in a virtual EAV environment . The system will execute a protocol where it will screen 6-7 different groups of food going over each individual element of the group and developing a matrix from 1-100 for that element from which the system will choose the most relevant number . The results will be for example : allergy to wheat 30%, allergy to milk 75%……..
K : The Virtual EAV of version 6 http://www.informationenergymedicine-academy.com/category/new-additions-in-core-6-0/tcm-module/ works exactly like any other CoRe testing and therefore all results have to be understood as relative as all other results and why absolute values are not possible I explained in my last post to your question about “how much” http://www.informationenergymedicine-academy.com/when-will-the-core-be-able-to-answer-the-how-much/
Jiro : The result will then be stratified or filtered and report generated . I think testing each item this way will give more accurate evaluation then the current relative evaluation used in CoRe . This will also open the possibilities to use CoRe as a pendulum . For example i have a question that I want to dowse where the result needs to be a number or a percentage like what is the appropriate carbohydrate ratio for this person. If i can enter that question to the CoRe system and then let the CoRe build a matrix from a specified range and dynamically chose the most appropriate number that will be much more dynamic and more appropriate . This is currently not possible as I have to provide all the possible ranges as distinct resonances like “best carb ratio 5%” , “best carb ratio 10%”…….. which is obviously less labile and dynamic
K: this is a one approach to read results – but you can do this already now – that if you see 100 % meat and 50% wheat it means there is a resonance to meat about twice as that to wheat. But dont make the simplistic mistake to now tell the person he should eat twice a much meat as bread or the other way round.
For me the first 2 items in an evaluation is all that is important at the current moment to address – and that by communicating the 2 items , by informing a carrier or by EMDR with these 2 items – this will focus the informational system on the momentary main interference/ polarity/ Yin-Yang and thanks the creator the system has enough intelligence to know how to react to it – if we get the help from CoRe or a friend to be alerted to this particular interference.